The battle between DeepSeek and companies like OpenAI
The geopolitical implications of DeepSeek's launch
What does it mean for the global AI market?
China’s DeepSeek vs. America’s AI Lead: A Changing Landscape
The AI race is no longer just about Silicon Valley. Enter DeepSeek, a Chinese AI startup that, despite being barely a year old, is challenging the dominance of American tech giants. With its flagship model, R1, DeepSeek has delivered performance on par with OpenAI’s o1—landing in the global top 10 for AI benchmarks. The kicker? DeepSeek accomplished this feat with less than $6 million and second-rate chips, a stark contrast to American competitors like Meta, which are spending tens of millions on training with premium hardware.
But is this cost efficiency too good to be true? While DeepSeek’s numbers impress, it’s worth questioning whether its progress builds on the open groundwork laid by companies like OpenAI, whose pioneering efforts demanded extensive resources. After all, being second often means you can achieve more with less.
DeepSeek-R1: Redefining Performance and Accessibility
Let's take a look at how this inexpensive model actually performs. According to DeepSeek’s open-source research, R1 matches OpenAI-o1’s official version in key areas, including mathematical reasoning, code generation, and natural language inference. This leap in performance is largely thanks to DeepSeek’s innovative use of reinforcement learning during the post-training phase, allowing the model to make substantial reasoning gains with minimal labelled data.
Leading with Openness
Netizens are commenting that DeepSeek is more ‘open’ than OpenAI as DeepSeek’s commitment to fostering an open and collaborative AI ecosystem is evident in its recent updates to licensing and user agreements:
MIT License for Full Openness
DeepSeek replaced its proprietary license with the widely recognised and permissive MIT License, streamlining accessibility for developers. The open-source repository—including model weights—is now entirely free for commercial use, with no extra permissions required.Empowering Innovation with Model Distillation
To encourage technological sharing, DeepSeek explicitly permits “model distillation.” This means developers can use R1’s outputs to train new models, fostering further innovation in the AI community.
By delivering top-tier performance at a fraction of the cost and embracing open-source principles, DeepSeek is challenging the traditional economics of AI development. Whether this represents a new era of cost-efficient innovation or a strategic leap built on the foundations of its predecessors, one thing is clear: the global AI race just got a lot more competitive.
The Trump Effect
The advancement of AI is no longer confined to a technological rivalry among companies—it has evolved into a full-scale geopolitical contest. Donald Trump’s return to the White House adds new complexity to the global AI battle. While his administration promises a historic investment in AI infrastructure, Trump’s stance on Chinese innovation is stark. During his campaign, he emphasised restricting China’s access to advanced chips, aiming to curb its AI advancements. But as 2024 demonstrated, China has found ways to innovate around these obstacles. DeepSeek’s R1, for instance, thrives on efficiency rather than sheer computational power, posing a formidable challenge to the “bigger is better” philosophy that dominates U.S. AI.
Trump’s inauguration speech highlighted AI as a transformative force akin to the Industrial Revolution. The following day, he announced the largest AI infrastructure project in history, signalling a commitment to bolster the nation’s lead. However, as China’s cost-effective AI models proliferate globally, America’s dominance looks more precarious than ever.
The Road Ahead
For the U.S., maintaining its edge in AI will require more than deep pockets. Trump’s administration must prioritise bold reforms: streamlining regulations to fast-track data centre construction, modernising defence procurement to integrate AI swiftly, and creating pathways to attract top global AI talent. But beyond domestic initiatives, striking the right balance between imposing chip export bans and building global alliances will be critical. While some advocate for lifting these restrictions to foster international collaboration, others caution that such moves could inadvertently strengthen China’s position in ways that are difficult to reverse.
DeepSeek’s rise is not just a technological achievement—it’s a wake-up call. The AI race is shifting from being a game of who can spend the most to who can innovate the fastest. On a broader scale, this isn’t just about China catching up to the U.S.; it’s about the open-source movement challenging the dominance of closed AI systems. What does the future hold for large-scale models? The race is far from over. Stay tuned. 🚀
💰 Curious about how the stock market is reacting to DeepSeek? Wondering how this Chinese AI company's breakthrough could influence your investment decisions?
W’re now offering these insights and access to our Insider’s Portfolio (currently up 97%!) for only USD $6/month (or GBP £5/month)!
Join over 32,000 subscribers who know that “Your money deserves better.”
In Case You Missed It 📬
📉 Elite MBAs Are Struggling to Land Jobs - What’s Happening?
Elite business schools, long regarded as ticket punches for six-figure careers, are facing a reality check. The share of MBA grads securing jobs within three months of graduation fell to 84% in 2024—a notable drop from past years. Even at top programs like MIT Sloan, figures are down significantly, with only 77% of grads employed three months post-graduation.
🚨 What's behind the struggle? Traditional havens for MBAs—consulting, finance, and tech—have hit hiring slowdowns. Consulting jobs at top firms like McKinsey and Bain declined by 25% last year, and big tech hiring has plummeted by over 50% at schools like Columbia and Chicago Booth. Meanwhile, grads are exploring alternative paths, including search funds and entrepreneurship, but these options remain niche.
🏫 Beyond hiring woes, business schools face questions about their relevance in a changing economy. With a growing focus on engineering and advanced STEM degrees, MBAs may need to rethink their curriculum to stay competitive. Will America’s business schools pivot or stay stuck in old patterns? Let us know your thoughts!
Keep in touch with Genuine Impact!
Instagram | X/Twitter | LinkedIn
Created by Arya